Dairy Foods
  Home
  Subscribe
  e-newsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Web Exclusives
  Dairy News
  Calendar of Events
  Dairy Field Reports
  DFR Behind the Scenes
  Ask The Experts
  DF Blog
  Videos
  Webinars
  Podcasts
  Source Book
  Supplier Product Guide
  FISA Distributer Guide
  Associations Index
  Current Issue
  Features
  Departments
  New Products + Marketing
  Ingredient Technology
  Plant Operations
  Resources
  Dairy Foods Archives
  Dairy Field Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  E-Newsletter Archive
  Career Center
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Digital Brochures & Supplements
  Case Studies
  White Papers
  DF Info
  Contact Ad Staff
  Media Kit
  Contact Editorial Staff
  Reprints
  DF Events
  Membrane Short Course
  Special Collections
  Dairy 100
  Supplier Spotlights
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Tharp and Young: Is it Possible to Formulate a True “Sugar-Free” Ice Cream?
by Tharp & Young
February 1, 2007

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The application of the descriptor “sugar-free” to ice cream would require the presence of <0.5 g per serving of sugars, i.e., the sum of all mono- and disaccharides. To produce such a product, it would be necessary to remove not only the conventional added sweeteners, as in no-sugar-added (NSA) products, but the lactose contributed by conventional dairy ingredients as well. When lactose is removed, the composition of the finished product is outside the requirements of the ice cream standard of identity, making it necessary to refer to such a product as a “sugar-free frozen dairy dessert” (SFFDD).

Removing lactose is a key first step. Hydrolyzing lactose into glucose and galactose does not reduce total “sugars.” Thus, SFFDD hinges on availability of milk-solids-not-fat where lactose and salts are otherwise removed (ultra-filtered milks; see column in September 1999 Dairy Foods). This process can produce undesirable flavors and functionalities. Milk protein isolates (MPI; > 90% total milk protein) are ultimately the milk protein ingredients of choice. Selection criteria include the proper balance of function, flavor, color and ratio of casein-to-whey protein.

Besides sweetness, SFFDD composition must also provide other functionalities of sweetening systems. These include bulking, management of freezing point and water immobilization. Two useful ingredients are maltitol syrup (MS) and digestion resistant maltodextrin (DRM). MS is a novel polyol composition that can provide all the sweetness and a portion of the functional elements of sugars. DRM can provide the additional bulk and management of freezing point needed. Since DRM is a dietary fiber, its use supports various “good-for-you” claims. In combination, both MS and DRM produce a frozen water profile that adds smoothness, creaminess, and resistance to heat shock. Neither MS nor DRM negatively affect flavor (either naturally occurring or added) quality or intensity, so the base mix remains technically neutral relative to flavor.


Photo Courtesy of Unilever Ice Cream
Photo Courtesy of Unilever Ice Cream
The choice of fat source is limited to butter and anhydrous milk fat (AMF). Butter (unsalted) is the preferred choice for a variety of reasons. Virtually any fat content can be formulated, but low fat (<3 g total fat per serving) options offer significant support for a variety of health-related claims.

Selection of the stabilizer and emulsifier system is critical to achieving superior eating quality and resistance to heat shock at ultra-low finished product weights. Conventional stabilizer/emulsifier combinations could be considered. Of particular interest is the use of improved microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), a.k.a. cellulose gel, as a critical component. This ingredient makes unique contributions to achieving superior eating qualities, heat shock resistance and high overruns without threat of over-stabilization properties. Emulsifier selection and use follow the same guidelines that apply to conventionally sweetened fat-modified products.

Overruns in access of 130%, depending on mix composition and claims to be made, are possible. This allows maximizing of total fat and minimizing total sugars.

As with all fat- and sugar-modified frozen desserts, flavor is the ultimate test. Proper mix ingredient selection and formulation is a start. The base mix must be compatible with support and delivery of the finest of flavors. A properly formulated, SFFDD can support a broad range of flavor profiles. Care in formulating is required to make sure flavor selection, type and amount is compatible with marketplace expectations.

Here is our recommended starting composition for a SFFDD: 4.7% milk fat, 3.5% MPI, 6.0% DRM, 23.0% MS (dry basis) and 0.60% of the advanced MCC-based system.


Other nutrient content and structure/function claims are available. For more details, including ingredient and flavoring selection, nutrition information and claims, formula options, regulatory insights and more, contact Dr. Bruce Tharp (610/975-4424) or Dr. Steven Young (281/596-9603) directly.


Check out Tharp & Young’s presentation at the theIDFA Ice Cream Technical Conference (www.idfa.org/meetings/2007_icecreamtech_agenda.cfm), “Sugar-Free Frozen Dairy Dessert.” Tharp and Young On Ice Cream Technical Short Course, Workshops, and Clinics, (www.onicecream.com) 10th Great Year! Dec 5-7, 2007, Las Vegas.


Tharp & Young

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
BNP Media