Dairy Foods
  Home
  Subscribe
  e-newsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Web Exclusives
  Dairy News
  Calendar of Events
  Dairy Field Reports
  DFR Behind the Scenes
  Ask The Experts
  DF Blog
  Videos
  Webinars
  Podcasts
  Source Book
  Supplier Product Guide
  FISA Distributer Guide
  Associations Index
  Current Issue
  Features
  Departments
  New Products + Marketing
  Ingredient Technology
  Plant Operations
  Resources
  Dairy Foods Archives
  Dairy Field Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  E-Newsletter Archive
  Career Center
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Digital Brochures & Supplements
  Case Studies
  White Papers
  DF Info
  Contact Ad Staff
  Media Kit
  Contact Editorial Staff
  Reprints
  DF Events
  Membrane Short Course
  Special Collections
  Dairy 100
  Supplier Spotlights
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Washington Watch: Bush to Cut Subsidies for WTO
by J. Mark Huffman
November 1, 2005

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The Bush Administration has signaled its desire to slash long-standing agricultural subsidies as part of the next WTO pact. U.S. Trade representative Robert Portman is suggesting cuts of up to 60% in U.S. subsidies to producers, which drew enthusiastic support from dairy manufacturers’ representatives.

“USTR’s aggressive proposal is exactly what is needed to get the crucial WTO negotiations back on track,” said Clay Hough, sr. v.p. and gen. counsel of the IDFA. “This should prompt real movement during December’s Hong Kong WTO Ministerial.”

Manufacturers have lobbied long and hard to reduce or eliminate agriculture subsidies they say keep the cost of raw dairy products artificially high. But Congress preserved many support programs in the recent extension of the Farm Bill. Portman’s proposal also faced a brick wall without agreement by other member nations to reduce their agricultural subsidies as well – something European governments, especially, have been unwilling to do in the past.

There was a bitter fight in Congress last summer over passage of the Central American Free Trade Agreement-Dominican Republic (CAFTA-DR) but the National Association of Manufacturers says the latest trade deficit numbers show it was right for lawmakers to approve it. While the overall U.S. trade deficit in manufactured goods has continued to worsen this year, a NAM report says the deficit with countries with which the United States has entered into free trade agreements has markedly improved.

“It’s time for those who opposed CAFTA, NAFTA and other FTAs to move past raw emotion and politics for a closer look at the facts,” said NAM President John Engler. “The facts show that free trade agreements are good for our trade balance, and that our economy stands to benefit from more of them as quickly as they can be negotiated.”

Engler said NAFTA and other free trade agreements now account for 43% of our manufactured goods exports, but only 6% of our deficit.

USDA has announced a third adjustment to the sugar program in order to increase U.S. market needs after the recent Gulf coast hurricanes caused supply disruptions. In this most recent adjustment, USDA increased the fiscal year 2006 marketing allotment quantity, and the sugar cane portion of the increase was immediately reassigned to imports.

The new total Overall Allotment Quantity is now 8.825 million short tons raw value, with 4.796 million STRV allocated to the beet sector and 4.029 million STRV allocated to the cane sector. The allocations of this OAQ increase to beet and cane companies will be announced later.



J. Mark Huffman
annews@crosslink.net
Dairy Foods' Washington correspondent. Contact him at 4741 Playfield St., Annandale, VA 22003. Phone: 703/425-6879 Fax: 240/201-8367

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
BNP Media