Food Safety for Dairy Processors / Operations / Dairy Foods Columnists

Use benchmarks to improve food safety

Establish a dairy product benchmarking system to provide easy-to-understand data that compares key food safety indicators against target food safety goals.

January 17, 2013
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

Everyone in dairy companies, including corporate management, has increased their focus on food safety over the past two years.

Much of this focus has been driven by the Food and Drug Administration’s Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) which provides FDA inspectors with increased access to processing records, mandatory recall and product detention powers, and dairy plants’ “preventative measures” programs. 

The detailed FSMA requirements for “preventative measures” that must be in written dairy plant operational programs are expected to be released soon, but were not ready as I wrote this. It is expected that these FDA requirements will be similar to requirements in the Global Food Safety Initiative’s (GFSIs) recognized third-party certification programs such as SQF, BRC, IFS, and FSSC22000.

How many resources (staff, equipment laboratory tests, etc.) do dairy companies and dairy plants need to dedicate to food safety programs to be FSMA-complaint, meet customer demands, achieve industry best practices and demonstrate due diligence? In other words, “When is enough enough?”

The answer lies with establishing a dairy product benchmarking system for food safety that provides easy-to-understand data that can compare key food safety indicators against target food safety goals.  Such a system operates similar to a dairy company’s accounting system in that it measures and categorizes many things, consolidates the many measurements into simple-to-understand reports and then allows company and plant managers to compare the consolidated data to company or plant target values. 

Just like a quarterly profit-and-loss financial statement allows management to make immediate adjustments in company finances, a food safety benchmarking program will allow these same company and plant managers to make quick adjustments to the amount and type of resources committed to food safety and avert costly product market withdrawals and public recalls.

A simple outline for such as system is listed below.  This outline can be enhanced and expanded to address all important food safety criteria that affect dairy product safety and easily and objectively identify food safety gaps.

1. Establish time periods where the food safety benchmarking data will be consolidated for a report to corporate or plant management (weekly, monthly, quarterly, annually).

2. Identify key food safety criteria, including:

  • Raw ingredients criteria (microbiological, temperature, pH, moisture content, etc. values)
  • Process equipment cleaning (CIP, COP and manual), including start-up ATP swab results
  • In-process measurements (temperature, pH and other food safety indicators)
  • Processing issues (daily production levels, numbers of product changes per line, equipment breakdowns, raw material shortages, scheduling amendments, etc.)
  • In-process product measurements (microbiological, temperature, pH, other food safety indicators)
  • Environmental monitoring results (general bacterial levels, target microbial pathogenic levels)
  • Internal plant audits as well as third-party, state and FDA food safety audit results

3. Establish categories for the ranges of data for each element within the criteria listed above. For example: “acceptable — low food safety risk,” “needs work — medium food safety risk” and “unacceptable — high safety risk.”

4. Assign numerical values to the ranges of data. For example: low risk is 10, medium risk is 5 and high risk is 1.

5. Add all numerical values for each food safety criteria. (See point #4, above).

6. Develop an on-going trend analysis that plots actual values for each food safety criteria against company and plant goals.

7. Failure to meet company and plant goals for at least two consecutive time periods (choose weeks or months) establishes a plant operational/personnel performance gap or a food safety resource gap.  Identify the root causes and if a lack of food safety resources is the cause, immediately address.

8. Track all resources committed to food safety per plant on a weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual basis against plant food safety numerical values to develop correlations between resource inputs and food safety improvements (gap shrinkages).

In order to achieve acceptable and sustainable food safety performance, dairy companies and dairy plants must establish food safety criteria, develop measurements of the criteria, evaluate acceptability of these measurements against company and plant goals and adjust food safety resources accordingly. And they must do this not just at the end of each fiscal year, but as frequently as weekly and monthly.  Only through this process of benchmarking of food safety can the dairy industry determine when “enough is enough” and effectively close food safety gaps.  

Contact me for more details about food safety benchmarking.they can get their hands on, from metals to plastic, and sell it for scrap.  Law enforcement is getting up to speed on the issue, and enforcement is active on the East and West Coasts. 


 

12th Annual Supplier Spotlights

 
This January 2013 issue of Dairy Foods gives you a better look at suppliers to the dairy industry that represent a variety of disciplines, from engineering and packaging to food ingredients and science plus laboratory expertise.
 

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Dairy Foods Magazine. 

Recent Articles by Allen Sayler

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Agropur, Natrel Division USA, St. Paul, Minn.

 At its Natrel Division plant in St. Paul, Minn, Agropur makes rBST-free white and flavored milk, heavy whipping cream, half n half, buttermilk, organic milk, nutritional drinks and shakes and sport drinks. Nondairy beverages (soy, rice, coconut, and almond) coffee creamers, broth and sauces. 

BehindtheScenes

This photo gallery contains additional, unpublished photos of dairy processing facilities featured in Dairy Foods magazine. To view more Behind the Scenes galleries go to our archives page!

9/23/14 2:00 pm EDT

Milk/Flavored Milk and Non-Dairy Beverages: Opportunities in the Beverage Segment

This free webinar will cover methods and ingredients available to increase protein levels, processing issues related to high-protein beverages, future ingredients and opportunities for protein fortification, adding value to milk and beverages, niche markets for high-protein milk and beverages and case studies of Core Power and Fairlife.

Training

Do you know what you’re doing?
View Results Poll Archive

Dairy Foods Magazine

august 2014 df cover

2014 August

Smith Brothers Farms is Plant of the Year; Plus we feature our annual Dairy 100 processors.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE DAIRY FOODS STORE

tharp-and-young-on-icecream.gif
Tharp & Young on Ice Cream: An Encyclopedic Guide to Ice Cream Science and Technology

An at once an all-inclusive guide to the meaning of hundreds of technical terms and ideas needed for ice cream manufacturing, as well as a practical introduction to the ingredients, freezing methods, flavoring, and packaging of ice cream, sherbet, sorbet, gelato, frozen yogurts, novelties and many other kinds of frozen desserts.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications, Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Dairy Foods Buyers Guide

cover df july 2013Resource for buyers in the dairy processing industry to find information on the leading suppliers and manufacturers.

Find Ingredients, Equipment, Distribution, R&D and More.

Start Your Search Today.

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook logo 40px 2-12-13 Twitter logo 40px 2-12-13  YouTube logo 40px 2-12-13  LinkedIn logo 40px 2-12-13google plus